[RFC-03] List syzUSD (Staked Yuzu Money USD) as a Neverland Collateral and Bootstrap Incentives

Governance Request for Comment
1

[RFC-03] List syzUSD (Staked Yuzu Money USD) as a Neverland Collateral and Bootstrap Incentives

Summary

This proposal seeks to onboard syzUSD, the yield-bearing ERC-4626 staked version of Yuzu Money’s overcollateralized stablecoin yzUSD, as a new collateral reserve in Neverland’s Aave V3 lending market on Monad. Alongside the listing, it proposes activating a dedicated DUST incentive allocation to bootstrap collateral supply during the asset’s ramp.

Yuzu Money is the premier “Yield-as-a-Service” bridge, connecting curated on-chain yield strategies to the global neobank and fintech ecosystem. We provide plug-and-play vaults that empower financial platforms to offer optimized, risk-managed yields without the technical complexity or regulatory friction of managing decentralized infrastructure. By combining on-chain leverage with institutional-grade RWAs, Yuzu delivers a new class of structured products purpose-built for the modern fintech platform.

syzUSD is a productive stable asset: its share price appreciates as Yuzu’s curated yield accrues to it, while the token stays fully composable across DeFi.

The proposed parameters are deliberately conservative for launch and gated on a Redstone oracle path.

Motivation

Because of the yield-bearing nature of syzUSD, its integration is expected to generate high blue-chip (USDC, AUSD, USDT) borrow demand. It also allows lenders to expose themselves to the performance of syzUSD without the need to KYC or wait for redemptions.

This also feeds a positive flywheel that allows Neverland’s liquidity to be better utilized, which generates more revenue from borrow-side activity.

Protocol and Collateral Details

yzUSD is Yuzu Money’s overcollateralized, asset-referenced stablecoin targeting $1, structured as the senior tranche of a tranched yield system. It is backed by curated on-chain strategies, short-dated treasuries, high-grade structured credit, overcollateralized loans, and market-neutral strategies such as funding-rate and cross-chain stablecoin arbitrage. In base form, yzUSD does not bear yield.

syzUSD is the staked, yield-bearing form: an ERC-4626 vault token whose share price appreciates as staking yield accrues to it. Yield is determined on a weekly epoch and accrues to the vault rather than rebasing balances, so syzUSD trends upward in value against yzUSD over time. Converting syzUSD back to yzUSD is subject to an unstaking window during which no further yield accrues. For Neverland’s purposes the property that matters is simple: 1 syzUSD is worth a growing amount of yzUSD, and yzUSD is worth ~$1, a slow-appreciating stable asset rather than a constant-price one.

Tranche protection (yzPP). yzUSD does not absorb first losses directly. The system carries a junior first-loss tranche, yzPP (Yuzu Protection Pool), whose depositors accept first-loss exposure on the underlying strategies in exchange for a higher target yield. Losses are absorbed by yzPP and the Reserve Fund ahead of senior yzUSD holders, which means syzUSD, being staked yzUSD, sits behind that same protective buffer. This tranching is the primary structural defense for the asset Neverland would be listing.

Operational and security defenses. Beyond the tranche structure, the stack is built around capital preservation:

  • Fordefi MPC secures on-chain operations and key management through an institutional MPC wallet (SOC 2 Type II), with permissioned access and quorum controls.

  • Hypernative / Sentinel provides real-time on-chain threat detection and a semi-automated response posture designed to react to potential exploits.

  • Independent proof of solvency / proof of reserves is published via Accountable, giving on-chain verifiability of the assets backing the system using zero-knowledge cryptography and secure enclaves, rather than self-reported figures.

Proposed Collateral Parameters

The asset would be onboarded collateral-enabled, with borrowing of syzUSD initially disabled (its value to Neverland is as productive collateral, not as a borrowable), and loosened by later governance as depth and oracle behaviour are observed.

Parameters Value
LTV 91.5%
Liquidation Threshold 93%
Liquidation Bonus 1.5%
Oracle Redstone (yzUSD–syzUSD exchange rate & yzUSD–USD fixed-rate)
Supply Cap $20M

Oracle path. syzUSD has two price legs: the yzUSD–USD peg (near $1) and the syzUSD–yzUSD exchange rate (the ERC-4626 share price, which only rises). The market composes both via Redstone feeds, with sanity bounds and staleness checks, so the collateral is priced as syzUSD->yzUSD × yzUSD->USD rather than from a raw DEX spot. The listing should be gated on this path being live and reviewed.

This is our formal proposal for the listing parameters of syzUSD on Neverland, however we fully acknowledge that the final risk parameters will be determined by the Neverland team and risk partners based on their overall assessment; we believe the proposed LTV of 91.5%, Liquidation Threshold of 93%, and Liquidation Bonus of 1.5% are appropriate and conservative, as these are parameters we already successfully use for similar yield-bearing stablecoin collaterals elsewhere without any material issues.

veDUST Incentive Request

In Neverland’s model, veDUST directs emission priorities across markets. This proposal requests starting DUST incentive allocation to seed the market and incentivize lending demand. Exact sizing is left to the team’s discretion once the listing is scheduled, and distribution can run on the existing infrastructure.

Conclusion

syzUSD brings Neverland a productive stable collateral: holders keep Yuzu’s native yield while collateralizing and earn DUST on top, and the borrow demand it unlocks feeds the veDUST flywheel. The asset sits behind a junior first-loss tranche (yzPP) and a Reserve Fund, with MPC custody, real-time monitoring, independent proof of solvency, and audits by Pashov and Dedaub, and it is already a meaningful share of Monad’s stable TVL.

The proposed parameters are conservative and gated on a composed Redstone oracle for both price legs, and the gauge keeps emission allocation under veDUST control. We invite community feedback on the listing, the parameters, the gauge, and the incentive request before this proposal progresses toward a Neverland Governance Vote.

References

2

Tbh, in the beginning Yuzu always gave me ruggy vibes. Observing how the team reacted to the RSETH turbulence and how cool they were under pressure changed my mind. I am invested in their junior tranche (yzPP), though I was luckily out during the incident that (only indirectly) affected Yuzu and didn’t get a haircut. The very existence of a junior tranche is good news for syzUSD as the depeg risk is greatly reduced. SyzUSD has decent onchain liquidity, although it is not as major as USDC, for example.
I support adding the asset with conservative supply caps.

4 Likes
3

As a Yuzu supporter, I fully support the introduction of syzUSD as collateral on Neverland. That said, given that syzUSD relies on leveraged looping strategies, I believe a more conservative risk framework is warranted, despite the presence of a junior tranche. Therefore, I would recommend setting the LTV at 88% and the Liquidation Threshold at 90%.

3 Likes
4

Newly emerging assets can be used as collateral, but they should be separated from mainstream assets. This helps to avoid similar problems that occurred with Aave in the past.

1 Like
5

Are the DUST incentives proposed for this asset going to reduce emissions for other assets, or will be part of the increased emission rate proposed for the next quarter?

2 Likes
7

exactly the first question which came to my mind when I read the proposal.

8

Another question after researching this more – it appears syzUSD is native to Plasma (in terms of staking and unstaking). What bridge(s) support moving this token to/from Monad and what is the bridge risk involved? I apologize for my ignorance on this token, I’ve only heard about it for the first time since this RFC opened.

1 Like
9

Third question – is there enough liquidity on Monad to handle liquidations of syzUSD in the event of a depeg/DeFi exploit elsewhere.

Fourth question – Why Redstone as the oracle? Is Chainlink not an option? How confident are we that the exchange rate is accurate?

4 Likes
10

I honestly had to go read about this market because I, for one, have been constantly bragging about how every market on Neverland is carefully selected to protect both the protocol and users. A lot of that conviction came from watching what happened with Echo and Curvance, where an external asset was compromised, fake assets were effectively created, and the lending protocol ended up inheriting risks that originated somewhere else.

So before forming an opinion on syzUSD, I wanted to understand exactly what Neverland would be listing.

And yh, after digging into it, I don’t think syzUSD falls into the same category of risk as the Echo situation. syzUSD is however not simply a stablecoin. It is the staked version of yzUSD, which itself is an overcollateralized stablecoin backed by a mix of strategies including treasuries, structured credit, lending markets, arbitrage strategies, and other yield-generating positions. In simple terms, syzUSD is a yield-bearing stable asset whose value grows over time as yield accrues.

What I actually found interesting is that Yuzu appears to have put considerable thought into capital preservation. The existence of yzPP as a junior first-loss tranche means losses are intended to be absorbed there before reaching yzUSD holders. There is also a Reserve Fund, MPC custody, proof-of-reserves, audits, monitoring systems, and a proposed oracle design that doesn’t rely on a simple DEX spot price. These are all positive signals.

From our perspective, I can clearly see the benefits.

For Neverland:
A new source of productive collateral.
Potentially strong stablecoin borrow demand.
Higher utilization of liquidity.
Increased protocol revenue from borrowing activity.
Further expansion of the lending ecosystem.

For users:
The ability to continue earning Yuzu yield while borrowing against the position.
Additional DUST incentives.
More capital efficiency without having to unstake or redeem assets.

That said, my biggest takeaway after researching this is that the primary risk is not necessarily a smart contract exploit or a fake minting event like Echo.

The bigger risk is dependency risk.

When Neverland lists syzUSD, it is effectively inheriting exposure to the systems that generate and protect the yield behind yzUSD. If the underlying strategies experience losses, if liquidity becomes stressed, if the protection layers become exhausted, or if redemption pressure becomes extreme, those risks could eventually flow downstream to syzUSD collateral and therefore to Neverland.

This leads me to the biggest question I have after reading the proposal:

How large are the actual protection layers relative to the size of the system?

The proposal repeatedly mentions yzPP and the Reserve Fund absorbing losses before yzUSD holders are affected, which is great. However, I would love to understand:

The current size of yzPP.

The current size of the Reserve Fund.

Their relationship to total yzUSD and syzUSD supply.

How much loss those buffers can realistically absorb before senior holders become affected.

To me, this is probably the most important risk question in the entire proposal.

I would also be interested in understanding:

The exact minting controls around yzUSD.

Upgradeability permissions.

Multisig structure and security assumptions.

Historical stress testing scenarios.

How the system behaves if a meaningful percentage of underlying strategies experience losses simultaneously.

Overall, I think this proposal is far more sophisticated than simply listing another stablecoin, and I can absolutely see the value it could bring to both ecosystems. The structure appears thoughtful, the launch parameters are capped, borrowing is initially disabled, and the oracle approach seems significantly safer than relying on DEX pricing alone.

My current view is that this is a potentially strong addition to Neverland, provided the community gains sufficient confidence in the size and resilience of the protection layers backing yzUSD. If those safeguards are as robust as the proposal suggests, then I think there is a compelling case for moving forward.

That said, the last question I am left with as a Neverland user and voter is if Yuzu lost 20% of its backing tomorrow, what exact mechanism prevents Neverland from inheriting those losses?

If we can get a clear answer to that, backed by data on the yzPP and Reserve Fund protections and their ability to absorb losses, then I think the community will be in a much better position to assess the risks and merits of this proposal.

5 Likes
11

I prefer reading everyone’s opinion and vote without voicing my own opinion. However, regarding a new collateral. I have to voice my opinion and get my questions answered.

Proposed Collateral Parameters

I don’t agree with the parameters stated in the proposal. The parameters should match the current Neverland’s standard for this type of collateral.

LTV: 85%
Liquidation Threshold: 90%
Liquidation Bonus: 5%
Oracle: Redstone
Supply Cap: $20m

My questions here are the following;

Why is redstone the only oracle listed?
Why start with $20m supply cap?
Are you expecting this supply cap to be reached and in what timeframe?
My questions regarding risk with the collateral has already been stated by @safe_onchain so I don’t want to repeat them. I look forward to the answers of those questions.

veDUST Incentive Request

On this request, why doesn’t Yuzu Money have a size in mind for the DUST commitment and timeframe? Also, why isn’t Yuzu Money offering to match the commitment? This feels like a lack of plan or you’re expecting Neverland to fund your defi expansion. Which is unacceptable either way.

My Current View

My current view is a “no” on this proposal as is. I would like my questions answered, Neverland’s standard parameters, and a solid incentive plan added to the proposal. Then I would change my vote to yes.

3 Likes
12

I would currently not be in favor of adding this as a market. I believe assets such as USDC/AUSDC/MON/wETH & (wBTC/cbBTC when available) should be prioritized for dust emissions.

The above assets are going to be the things currently that will bring more users to Neverland and I don’t believe there is a huge demand for syzUSD on Monad.

2 Likes
13

Gnever fam!

I don’t know about syzUSD and tbh, as a busy dad, I don’t have much time…

I am into Mudigital since a while and I was sad I couldn’t lend more of their assets in neverland, but I understood why the team did it.

So for this syzUSD, I leave it for the defi masters you are, but because I am not into it convince why it would be good or not for neverland, which I am fully in​:wink:

14

Convince me why should I vote for or not.

Always loved to challenge politicians!

And neverland looks more like a democracy than our countries…

15

Just to put this out there – the only liquidity pool I could find is a Balancer V3 with $350K of liquidity. There is about $4M on chain supplied to Morpho and Curvance markets. Another wallet, the top holder on chain, has $3.7M sitting idle. My largest concern is the lack of liquidity and trading volume of this token on chain, in the event syzUSD depegs. They also appear to use a LayerZero bridge, which is the other risk.

6 Likes
16

This is my main issue outside of diverting potential additional dust incentives to the main markets. The top holder(~92% per above)could theoretically take the overwhelming majority of dust rewards for an asset I don’t think most Monad users are really concerned with at the moment.

1 Like
17

I do think a more conservative LTV and liquidation threshold is warranted for this asset, given the pooled nature of Neverland and the fact this is a bridged asset with relatively lower liquidity on chain. I think starting with a lower supply cap is warranted to. The proposed supply exceeds the entire bridged value on chain right now. EarnAUSD is an LTV of 85% with a cap of $5M.

3 Likes
18

The answers to most of those questions can be found here.

In the RSETH mint exploit, the Yuzu team reacted quickly and worked around the clock to prevent losses to the protocol. I think when the smoke cleared yzPP holders lost 4% (and were still up 9% from inception after the haircut) and yzUSD holders lost absolutely nothing.
More can be found here.

19

If introduced before the next quarter, there would need to be a re-allocation of emissions to direct some to this new market.

20

muBOND is most likely not accepted as collateral on Neverland because it’s a junior tranche, making it too risky (too degen) for Neverland’s collateral requirements.

21

I can’t speak on behalf of the Yuzu team to answer your other questions, but can confirm that RedStone is the only Oracle available for this asset.